New Book: Inspiration Corner

About a month ago I announced that I was preparing to write a new book. I also sent out an email to my subscribers asking for recommendations of books, studies or articles that they think may be useful for me.
After two months and over 60 books I’m wrapping up the research phase for the new book. A number of people asked me which books I found the most interesting or inspirational heading into the new book and I told them I’d put them in a post. This is that post.
The books below are by no means the “best” books for you or for anybody necessarily. They’re simply the one’s that informed my chosen topic the best and inspired me to think about masculinity and masculine emotional development in new or exciting ways. Some of them are dry and theoretical. Others may seem out of place. But they were all useful to me.
Instead of the format of my usual book reviews, I’m going to keep the editorializing short on this post, since there are so many books to list.
As for the postmaculine book, I plan on spending this week reviewing my notes and outlining. Goal is to start writing next week (coincidentally my birthday).
The Books
Passion and Reason: Making Sense of Our Emotions by Richard and Bernice Lazarus – A theoretical examination of the different emotions and what psychological purposes they serve us, how we deal with them, and how we can learn to deal with them better.
Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman – Read this one years ago. Re-read parts of it for this book. At this point it’s a classic. Makes the case that “emotional intelligence” or one’s ability to deal with emotional/social problems is far more important and determinant of life success than straight up IQ.
The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development by Robert Kegan – I was aware of Kegan but I had never read him. Best developmental psychology model I’ve come across. Takes what Piaget did and just goes further with more depth. (Thanks to the reader who recommended this.)
Lord of the Flies by William Golding – Everyone read this in high school except me. Noticed it coming up in book after book I read about masculinity and social pressures put on boys. Thought-provoking.
Raising Cain: Protecting the Emotional Life of Boys by Michael Thompson and Dan Kindlon – Two Harvard psychiatrists with 30+ years experience working with boys’ emotional problems. Eye opening descriptions of how the pressures and expectations of masculinity can cause some boys problems growing up.
Marriage, A History: How Love Conquered Marriage by Stephanie Coontz – Bought this on a whim and planned on skimming it. Ended up not being able to put it down. Marriage, it turns out, has evolved a LOT in social function over the centuries and Coontz makes the convincing case that it’s evolving once again.
The High Price of Materialism by Tim Kasser – A clear psychological argument against the pursuit of money and success for the sake of wealth and success. (Thanks to the reader who recommended this.)
The Icarus Deception by Seth Godin – As with all Godin books there’s a lot of fluff, but the core point is important and brilliant. Godin argues that the new circumstances of today’s economy requires one to ignore the fable of Icarus and that it is now economical to risk flying as close to the sun as possible.
Daring Greatly by Brene Brown – The definitive book on vulnerability and how it leads to greater psychological health and better relationships with both men and women. Has a great section on masculinity and shame. Her best work by far. If you liked her TED talks, definitely check it out.
Race Against the Machine by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee – Two economists break down the evidence that the economic problems the world is facing at the moment are more than just another recession, but that there’s a fundamental restructuring of resources and labor happening that’s being caused by technological change. (Thanks to the reader who recommended this.)
Delusions of Gender by Cordelia Fine – A feminist book. It absolutely beats you over the head with scientific studies showing that many of the supposed “biological” differences between men and women are either barely significant or completely non-existent. Hard to swallow at times. And she definitely has her soapbox now and then. But no book has changed my views on gender as much as this one. And I’ve read a lot of books on gender.
Why Do I Do That? by Joseph Burgo – Psychoanalysts break down of psychological defense mechanisms. The author’s argument is that many of the changes we wish to change in ourselves are merely defense mechanisms to deeper psychological issues. (Thanks to the reader who recommended this.)
Status Anxiety by Alain de Botton – I’m not a huge fan of his writing, but the thesis of this book is too big and too important to ignore. De Botton argues that an unintentional side-effect of meritocracy is the anxiety and stress that comes with worrying about one’s status and perceived “success”. He also argues that this brings a lot of psychological pressures and creates low self worth in individuals who don’t happen to “make it.”
Development in Adulthood by Erik Erikson – Nerdy and uber-theoretical. Had trouble getting through parts of it. But Erikson is the father of the psychology of identity formation and was the first to argue that humans continue to develop psychologically even through adulthood and old age (neurophysiology has since proved him right).
Civilization and Its Discontents by Sigmund Freud – Freud’s classic and famous work. He argues that the ability to live together and prosper in society requires us to create culture and customs that suppresses many of our instinctual drives to sex and violence. It then follows that psychological dysfunction is a necessary cost of reaping the benefits of civilization. He also shits all over religion.
Erotic Capital by Catherine Hakim – A sociologist argues that because men have greater sex drives than women, women inherently have an “erotic capital” that can be transmuted into financial, social or emotional capital. Again, what’s blindingly obvious to most men is considered controversial and profound in academia.
Sex at Dawn by Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jetha – Read it years ago but re-read it for the new book. The scientific argument against monogamy being the natural state of humans. Convincing. Created quite a stir a few years ago when it came out.
Explaining Unhappiness: Dissolving the Paradox by Peter Spinogatti – A unique twist on psychoanalysis as usual. Spinogatti believes that all emotional dysfunctional is caused by a logical paradox in getting one’s needs met and that by rationally resolving the paradox, one can begin to fre themselves from the dysfunction.
The Evolution of Human Sexuality by Donald Symons – Dense but worth it. The best treatment of how sexual selection actually occurs I’ve come across. Debunks a lot of faulty reasoning and garbage evolutionary arguments that you see all the time.
Masculinities by R. W. Connell – Very academic but a seminal work in its field. Connell explains how “masculinity” is contextual and that there are actually various masculinities which exist within a broader masculinity.
Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity by David Gilmore – Gilmore shows that masculinity is culturally relative and even changes over time depending on economic circumstances.
The End of Men And the Rise of Women by Hanna Rosin – Probably the best-reasoned and most even-handed take on the state of gender at the moment. Rosin shows that while women are gaining or passing men in some areas, they still lag far behind in others. It seems the progress women have made has not been even across society and that this is making it hard to understand where men and women really stand.
The Happiness Trap by Russ Harris – Based on ACT, a new therapy developed based on some eastern philosophical principles. Resonates strongly with me and what I’ve written here for years.
The Fourth Economy: Inventing Western Civilization by Ron Davison – In a very long-winded and slightly grandiose book, Davison makes the argument that the economy is re-orienting itself to reward creativity and innovation more than hard work, service or anything else.



It’s funny that Erotic Capital turned up on your list. I just finished reading it a day ago, after picking it up at random from the library.
It had a few interesting ideas but overall I wasn’t that impressed. Lots of sweeping generalizations about genders and sexual orientations, and reductionistic thinking about how relationships work.
I also found it odd what she left out, like how she argued that more women could cash in on their erotic capital by getting into the high-paying sex trade, but didn’t once mention the millions of personal or emotional reasons why someone might not want to sell their body to strangers. To her it was all about the patriarchy stigmatizing sex work so women would be more likely to give it up for free.
She definitely had a weird thing about sex work as I recall. What I took from it is the broad realization that men’s greater biological desire for sex can be leveraged by women in various ways. She lost me in some of the specifics.
Mark, Mark,
I’m mildly drunk, but I was thinking about that Erotic Capital shit all night, and while I haven’t read anything about it, from my personal knowledge “that because men have greater sex drives than women, women inherently have an ‘erotic capital’ that can be transmuted into financial, social or emotional capital” surely CANNOT be transmuted to bloody women’s sexual experience capital, which we’d like to enfold more of, if not A LOT more than any men we’ve met were able to provide (and I’m not talking about nymphos now). Just going through the motions of hasty lazy masturbatory sex, which most man seem to be able to get off from in like 5 minutes, and opportunistic women/desirable people in general can turn into other kinds of liquidity, is a sorry replacement for pleasures ad depths of sexual expression to beging with… Frankly, it’s embarrassing to life itself. Those who have to pay suck at sex, badly. Even the ones who fuck a lot. It’s like they want it bad, but once they get around it, they just do the same old thing with it in their heads, that they could do with a jar full of chicken liver and pornhub. Blech. No wonder desirable people are asking to be paid for participation.
It’s not about the sex drive, it’s about satisfying connection, and most people are bloody not willing or able to connect and give any real sexual pleasure to the other, thus the only need for sexual capital conversion in any context, gay or straight (sorry for the tipsy post:)
I don’t disagree with you. I didn’t mean sex itself as much as, you know, the whole “Men think with their dicks” thing. Sex appeal, I guess you would call it.
You know, like Marilyn Monroe pulls out a cigarette and five men pull out lighters.
With that said, it sounds like you need to meet better men.
Not unlike with Marilyn, it goes down to propensity to pick the biggest dick in the room, but not in a good way… Thanks for the reading list, most of the stuff sounds wildly interesting
I haven’t read the book myself, so I admittedly am only going off your hearsay, but that seems like a strange premise. Even if that was part of the reason, it’s quite a stretch to call that the whole reason. For example there’s a very strong case for the idea that female non-sex workers also have a strong incentive to keep the sex-worker stigma alive, because sex workers lower the price for sex and increase sexual competition. The more of a monopoly over sexual access non-sex worker females have, the more leverage they have to obtain relationships, marriage, and material goods in exchange for sex.
I still plan to read this book for myself, but I’m curious from anyone who’s read it, does she put most of the blame for female promiscuity stigmas solely on straight men, or does she discuss the benefits straight women derive from such taboos as well?
I believe it does. Feminists hate the book, if that tells you anything.
What I got out of it is how the imbalance in sexual desire can alter behavior and advantages/disadvantages in both men and women.
T:
It’s only been a day since finishing the book, but already my memories of the details may not be crystal clear. When discussing the stigma towards sex work the author makes two main points:
* It’s in the patriarchy’s interest to perpetuate social mores (e.g., stigmatizing prostitution) that lead ordinary women to continue to give sex away for free, and to keep them in the dark about the full power of their erotic capital. If women knew about their erotic capital’s true potential, and then aggressively used it to extract benefits from men, the power of the male gender would be weakened.
* When feminists condemn and criticize sex work as being violent or exploitative they think they’re battling the patriarchy, but they’re actually playing into what it wants; keeping a stigma on sex work. If feminists really wanted to help women, they’d help them to realize how much they could cash in on their erotic capital, including by working in the sex trade.
The point you mentioned about average women benefiting from limiting competition form sex workers didn’t come up.
Thanks Kevin. I actually agree with the author’s points, I just wish she also touched on the ways straight women who are selling a “good girl” image also benefit from keeping the slut shaming alive and shutting down sex workers. I will still read her book though. .
That’s a really weird thing to support. It’s like she’s advocating the oppression of one gender group (men) by another (women), which common sense tells you is just wrong. In certain cultures where men have a lower sex drive (Japan, for example), women’s erotic capital certainly seems somewhat diminished compared to the west. And how come she isn’t considering financial support (paying for food, gifts, or any sort of lifestyle support) as equivalent or similar to direct cash compensation?
Sex at Dawn changed my entire life. I’m definitely going to be trying to chew my way through some of these now. As always, thanks, Mark.
The book also changed my life profoundly. Will be purchasing the Post Masculine book Mark.
Great list, Mark. I’m going to purchase this and/or the PostMasculine book. Would you be willing to post a handful of sample pages from either?
I’ll post excerpts from the PM book before I release it.
Ever get around to reading The Bonds of Love?
I think in a separate post you mentioned you’d read Hegel, de Beauvoir, and Marx, and here you mention Freud. She synthesizes their works, along with the literature on relational psychoanalysis.
No! Still not available for Kindle! I may order it and ship it to my mom’s house since I’m going to be visiting her briefly in April.
Mark – I’m curious if you’ve read Nicole Daedone’s book “Slow Sex” or heard of the OMing movement. It seems to be a US-based thing, so if not, no worries. It’s an interesting perspective on sexuality, I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on it. I’ve watched her TED talk but haven’t purchased the book yet myself.
Cheers!
I haven’t. Looked it up. Looks interesting but not relevant to the book I’m writing.
Mark,
Would it be better use to read and re-read your book many times, or to read it once in addition to as many as we can from this list of books?
Do whatever feels right to you.
Read sex at dusk, it totally destroys the argument that sex at dawn puts forth.
Yeah, actually just did last night. A reader sent in a link to a biologist tearing up the book on her blog as well. It’s gotten me reading a few other books and getting the bigger picture.
I love to read books as well, but the problem is that you just can’t reread every article that they cite in order to check it’s correct.
These days I use google “title of the book + myth”, seems to work well
Haha… skepticism for the win.
Hey Mark, if the book’s going to have a focus on emotions/emotional dysfunction then obviously I’m going to recommend some TA stuff, particularly Games People Play since it’s short and has an important takeaway regarding the way that emotional dysfunctions lead to maladaptive manners of living and interacting socially that exist as a means of meeting emotional needs (“playing games”) as opposed seeking out true intimacy in an emotionally healthy manner.
who reccommended the Tim Kasser Book? I totally had him as a professor in college.
nice list, looking forward to book. emailed you about it already but Nassim Taleb’s anti-fragile is a must read
Mark, can you please release your new book in Kindle format?
Hopefully that you will also release “Models” in Kindle format. Many os us Kindle users find PDF impractical, to say the least.
I encourage you and I am happy that you are doing what you fear, which is writing these new books you have been thinking about.
Yes, it will come out on Kindle. Models is already available on Kindle. Look on Amazon.
This is an excellent bibliography. It is, of course, odd not to see any books from the psychology of men and masculinity. But I’m guessing they are in the long tail of your research.
The Connell, Kimmel and Gilbert books don’t count? Read a few others, but those were the best ones.
You are right about Connell and Gilbert; they are important voices in this realm. I don’t think you listed Kimmel in the blog, but his “Manhood in the Making” is clutch. I would also recommend Kilmartin’s book from this list:
http://www.psychologyofmen.org/index.php?itemid=16
I am doing some work with Andrew Smiler, who recently published this:
http://www.amazon.com/Challenging-Casanova-Beyond-Stereotype-Promiscuous/dp/1118072669/
Finally, my highest recommendation is this book by Valerio:
http://www.amazon.com/Testosterone-Files-Hormonal-Social-Transformation/dp/1580051731
When I was doing my master’s thesis on masculinity, this book was a huge influence on my thinking.
By the way, I will be at your talk in Salt Lake on Friday.
Yeah “Manhood in the Making” was excellent and I did forget to mention it.
I read “Challenging Casanova” and really had trouble getting through it. Probably because I went through a heavy, heavy promiscuous phase myself, it really felt like I was being lectured about how immoral I was, and I couldn’t get through all of it. I didn’t necessarily disagree with all of his points, but his tone came across as very sex-negative to me.
Never read the Valerio book, but I’ll take a look at it. See you in Utah.
Yeah, sex-negative stuff is a bummer.
The Valerio book has some beautiful phenomenological descriptions of testosterone’s effects. While we can’t draw absolute conclusions from the accounts, but it’s great mental fodder.
Yeah, the test stuff is interesting and I think a key focal point on gender. I bought the Valerio book, but won’t get it until I get to Philadelphia. Excited to check it out.