![]() |
|
Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Printable Version +- Postmasculine.com Forum (http://postmasculine.com/forum) +-- Forum: PostMasculine.com (/Forum-PostMasculine-com) +--- Forum: Dating and Relationships (/Forum-Dating-and-Relationships) +--- Thread: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization (/Thread-Lovemaking-Bonding-vs-fertilization) |
Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-17-2012 05:38 PM Me and my girlfriend have been practicing "karezza" because we have been reading the book Cupid's Poison Arrow: From Habit to Harmony in Sexual Relationships together out loud. I'll admit, we aren't very far in the book but we have began to practice what it is teaching us (we skip to some of the examples now and then). It basically talks about how there are two forms of lovemaking. One is for bonding, one is for fertilization. People grow tired of each other after a lot of lovemaking with the "intent" of fertilizing (orgasms). I'm not going to claim to know everything the book is teaching as I'm just reading it. I wanted to share it here. I've never been more horny in my life. I want to run through a wall. This stuff mixed with no porn trying as hard as I can not to masturbate ever and saving myself for actual sex is driving me insane. I think in a good way though. I'll keep you guys updated. Just wanted to see if anyone else had anything to say or knew anything about these practices. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Halo Effect - 03-17-2012 07:02 PM I'm very curious how it will be for you. Is it true that you avoid orgasm with karezza? RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-17-2012 07:05 PM I don't think they are strictly avoided. I believe they do happen and that's OK. I think the main change is that they are not your goal or primary reason for making love. I'm still learning but I'm really enjoying what I learn so far. My girlfriend likes it a lot too. This book is really interesting and I look forward to finishing it. I'd definitely recommend it so far. I don't know if it's completely scientifically accurate but it seems to make sense to me. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - crazyhorse - 03-17-2012 09:01 PM (03-17-2012 07:05 PM)Zac Wrote: I don't think they are strictly avoided. I believe they do happen and that's OK. I think the main change is that they are not your goal or primary reason for making love. I'm still learning but I'm really enjoying what I learn so far. My girlfriend likes it a lot too. This book is really interesting and I look forward to finishing it. I'd definitely recommend it so far. I don't know if it's completely scientifically accurate but it seems to make sense to me. you can ask Marnia Robinson on the reuniting forum. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Tobias - 03-17-2012 10:55 PM That reminds me of balooning: http://www.actionlove.com/cases/case10565.htm RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Mark - 03-17-2012 11:00 PM I just find the idea of "sex for fertilization" funny. Guy 1: "Hey dude, how'd it go with that chick last night?" Guy 2: "Dude, I fertilized the shit out of her. Like 3 times too." *high five* RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Tobias - 03-17-2012 11:05 PM (03-17-2012 11:00 PM)Mark Wrote: Guy 1: "Hey dude, how'd it go with that chick last night?" If evo psy IS right, then this SHOULD be the way to talk about sex
RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-18-2012 02:33 AM lol, I know what you are saying Mark. Did you read the book though? It makes sense. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Chaos - 03-18-2012 07:21 PM I can ASSURE you when I take a girl to bed there's nothing further from my intentions right now that fertilizing her.... Ahhhhhhhh!!!! RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-18-2012 08:50 PM I can assure you that your genes have a lot more control over your behavior than you realize. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Chaos - 03-18-2012 08:53 PM That's why condoms were invented... I have the genes of a nonfertilizer
RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - dr. love - 03-18-2012 11:08 PM Some time ago two of my (pua) friends actually aimed at becoming a father from a one night stand. They had holes in their condoms in case the girl would demand the use of contraception. The other one of them told me back then: "Think about how relieved you'll be when you've become a father. It wouldn't matter that much if you died today since your genes would live on." Their rationalization was something like "if this is all about survival & replication, why not go all the way" Both of them were still studying at the time, but they said they'd pay for the custody happily too
RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Tim - 03-18-2012 11:12 PM (03-18-2012 11:08 PM)dr. love Wrote: Some time ago two of my (pua) friends actually aimed at becoming a father from a one night stand. They had holes in their condoms in case the girl would demand the use of contraception. The other one of them told me back then: "Think about how relieved you'll be when you've become a father. It wouldn't matter that much if you died today since your genes would live on." Their rationalization was something like "if this is all about survival & replication, why not go all the way"
RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-18-2012 11:28 PM (03-18-2012 08:53 PM)Chaos Wrote: That's why condoms were invented... I have the genes of a nonfertilizer You don't understand the concept but it's OK because I'm not clearly explaining it. Give me some time to read more of the book. I kind of got sidetracked by Atlas Shrugged and the fact my lady moved back to her dorm because spring break is over. Quote:Some time ago two of my (pua) friends actually aimed at becoming a father from a one night stand. They had holes in their condoms in case the girl would demand the use of contraception. The other one of them told me back then: "Think about how relieved you'll be when you've become a father. It wouldn't matter that much if you died today since your genes would live on." Their rationalization was something like "if this is all about survival & replication, why not go all the way" I'm pretty sure in most places tricking someone into having unprotected sex when they agree to protected sex is rape. Either way, those guys were a little off.... imo. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Mark - 03-19-2012 04:41 AM (03-18-2012 11:08 PM)dr. love Wrote: Some time ago two of my (pua) friends actually aimed at becoming a father from a one night stand. They had holes in their condoms in case the girl would demand the use of contraception. The other one of them told me back then: "Think about how relieved you'll be when you've become a father. It wouldn't matter that much if you died today since your genes would live on." Their rationalization was something like "if this is all about survival & replication, why not go all the way" This is the most fucked up thing I've heard all week. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Salaam - 03-31-2012 03:42 PM I've never read or even heard of the book till now, but there are some powerful emotions that are tied to fertilization. I'm not planning on having kids right now or maybe ever, but one of the most intense orgasms I've ever had was when I was with a woman I loved so much that I wanted her to be the mother of my child. The thought literally came out of nowhere, but it infused so much emotion and energy into our lovemaking that ever since I've never viewed sex the same. I'm not trying to come off as some hippy or something, but there are some strong primal forces involved with desire and creation... thing is I never told her I had felt that, because I was scared. But I know she felt how deep I cared for her. Emotional connection is so important to me now, in fact orgasm comes second to it. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-31-2012 04:08 PM Thank you for your response. You've been posting some great stuff. Our bodys urge us to engage in "fertilzation driven" sexual behavior. Our reward centers (I think you call them that) are specifically programmed to reward this behavior as much as possible. The book says the problem lies in the fact that what our reward centers want and what is best for our relationships aren't always the same thing. The book says that less frequent fertilization behavior and more frequent bonding lead to closer connections and more intimate sexual experiences. I really like this book so far and would recommend it to anyone, especially if you are in a relationship. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Halo Effect - 03-31-2012 05:20 PM (03-31-2012 04:08 PM)Zac Wrote: Thank you for your response. You've been posting some great stuff. Bonding behavior is stuff like cuddling, stroking, making noises like "Hmm", expressing appreciation, complimenting, right? I do a lot of that already. And I definitely develop strong emotional connections with girls. But you can have both sex with orgasms and do that, IMO. Quote:I'm not planning on having kids right now or maybe ever, but one of the most intense orgasms I've ever had was when I was with a woman I loved so much that I wanted her to be the mother of my child. The thought literally came out of nowhere, but it infused so much emotion and energy into our lovemaking that ever since I've never viewed sex the same. I believe Dan Rose in Sex God Method (ebook) says that dirty talk about getting her pregnant can be extremely powerful to a woman. And that it should be used with caution because she might end up actually wanting your babies. I have not tried that one yet myself.
RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 03-31-2012 05:30 PM Orgasms change your brain chemistry. When you orgasm your brain goes through a cycle. Repeatedly tripping this cycle together for a long period of time can lead to boredom and other problems in relationships. So the book claims. Bonding sex goes beyond cuddling and all that but that is all a good start. The book continues to hammer home the fact that having sex with the purpose of orgasm "fertilization" all the time will more often than not trend towards not great things in the long run and that a much heavier emphasis on bonding sexual behavior will create stronger emotional awareness and ties. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Mark - 03-31-2012 05:30 PM Quote:I believe Dan Rose in Sex God Method (ebook) says that dirty talk about getting her pregnant can be extremely powerful to a woman. And that it should be used with caution because she might end up actually wanting your babies. I have not tried that one yet myself. And Dan Rose has a baby-mama... coincidence? Probably not, hahaha... But yeah, I'll pass on that. With that said, I fertilized the shit out of my Brazilian GF last night... (it still cracks me up to say this). RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Salaam - 03-31-2012 09:23 PM (03-31-2012 04:08 PM)Zac Wrote: Thank you for your response. You've been posting some great stuff. Appreciate it my dude. What you wrote makes sense to me, because that feeling I had was definitely not something I could see being an everyday thing, especially when taking biological feedback loops associated with our reward centers into consideration. Honestly I don't even see how I could consciously recreate that experience, it can't be forced thats for sure. (03-31-2012 05:20 PM)Halo Effect Wrote: I believe Dan Rose in Sex God Method (ebook) says that dirty talk about getting her pregnant can be extremely powerful to a woman. And that it should be used with caution because she might end up actually wanting your babies. I have not tried that one yet myself. Lol, fuck thats playing with fire. The last thing I want to do is have a woman think its baby making time. If it ever happens to me again, I'm gonna just continue to keep it to myself. I love amazing sex, but shit, we're still in a recession. Pampers is expensive. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - crazyhorse - 04-02-2012 11:22 AM Zac have you signed up at the reuniting forum? I made a comment about it to Marnia and said that karezza seemed to becoming popular on the postmasculine forum. I'm sure she'll gladly help you out. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Halo Effect - 04-02-2012 11:33 AM (03-31-2012 05:30 PM)Mark Wrote: And Dan Rose has a baby-mama... coincidence? Probably not, hahaha... Wrong hole, Mark. ![]() My doubts about karezza being better than sex that is more focused on orgasm need to be clarified. Let me say first that I have never had a relationship that lasted longer than a year, and I haven't read much about karezza, and I am biased because I have put much effort into becoming better in bed and learning to give women pleasure, and if it is true that the best way of having sex is not focused on orgasm, then this pisses me the fuck off... classic cognitive dissonance. Having said that, we could make three categories of sex: - Karezza - Normal sex that normal couples have - "Masterful Lover" sex, the sex that David Shade teaches (and similar teachers) I can be very easily convinced that karezza is superior to normal sex. From what I hear, it is very common for men to be god awful in bed. It is very common that couples have less and less sex as time wears on, usually because the woman gets bored with it. One big reason why relationships can fail in the long term is the lack of sex or the lack of any sexual attraction that happens after a while of this. What David Shade teaches is not simply sexual techniques. It goes much, much further than that. And there are countless reports of how using those lessons have improved relationships dramatically, even 10+ year marriages. A "Masterful Lover" (David Shade's term) knows sexual techniques, yes. But he is also a man who believes strongly in himself, who is masculine, confident, assertive, a leader, a man who respects himself and a man who always holds his word. A man who absolutely loves women and understands their needs, and who has a neverending fascination with female sexuality and pleasure. He likes nothing so much as to give his girlfriend or wife pleasure and to make her feel good. Outside of the bedroom, he makes sure that she feels sexy, feminine, beautiful, special and appreciated, and he cultivates a strong, intimate emotional connection. Being a strong, dominant and masculine, yet vulnerable and sensitive man is part of being a "Masterful Lover". In bed, he makes her feel uninhibited. He takes away any shame and makes her feel fully validated. He takes all the responsibility and she can let go into pleasure she never thought possible. He knows that good sex is not just physical but that female sexuality is mostly emotional and mental. He makes it absolutely clear that sex is not just about him or his pleasure. Sex is about their special bond, and about her pleasure. He knows her sexual fantasies and he revels in them and uses those to turn her on. He always keeps the sex exciting. THAT is what I compare Karezza with. And it may very well be that many of the things that make Karezza effective are the same things that make what I wrote above effective. But I certainly believe that amazing sex (with orgasms!) can bring two people closer. RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - Zac - 04-02-2012 01:08 PM I think seperating these things into catergories is a mistake. The point being made in the book is that if you continue to have orgasm after orgasm with a partner over and over and over again you have an evolutionary process that makes you want to leave that person. It can cause resentment and all sorts of other issues in your relationship. Having sex this way puts you into "cycles" and everyone's is different. Some people take years, a year, a day, or a week. You lose interest after a while. This is not "healthy" sexual practice according to the book. Apparently most of us are dopamine addicts that care more about getting that next spike than what is best for our relationships and our own personal mental health in the long run. People who practice Karezza tend to be more stable because their brain chemistry isn't fluctuating off the charts, or so the book says. Not orgasming all the time and instead focusing on the bonding aspects of lovemaking rather than your evolutionary end goal of a "fertilizing" orgasm. It all still feels good and you actually feel very satisfied when you get in a good rhythm. I have yet to really find the groove I've wanted. This strengthens the bond. It doesn't say not to orgasm mind you but it does say to do it less. Of course whenever you do anything with your woman you want to rock her world. If that anything is simply lying next to each other an a scissor position just resting against each other, do it like it's the last day of the fucking world and you want to do it as well as possible. In the book it explains that most people are very hesitant and reluctant to go down this path because it seems so counter intuitive. @crazyhorse I JUST joined the forum today. Could you link here to your post? The forum is HUGE. I'm excited to learn more. Thank you. I think Mark should try and interview some people about this
RE: Lovemaking: Bonding vs. fertilization - crazyhorse - 04-02-2012 01:19 PM (04-02-2012 01:08 PM)Zac Wrote: I think seperating these things into catergories is a mistake.Here's the thread Zac: http://www.reuniting.info/blogs/gary/other-porn-experiment-our-latest-pt-post I mentioned something about one of our forum members trying out Karezza and said that his girlfriend liked it a lot. Also congratulations on your courage for trying this out and being open about it. I woldn't pay that much attention to some of the comments. The biggest cliche in dating is that relationships don't last longer then the 3 year mark. If people have been having sex the conventional way all the time, then why couldn't something else work? In fact, I believe she writes in her book to try both ways out for three weeks and compare the two. That's a very healthy attitude. Good luck with it! |