look like you're book got reviewed by Aaron Sleazy

[crazyhorse]

haha Sledgehammer you're comment made his blog.

http://aaronsleazy.blogspot.com/2011/12/...eight.html

[Alvar]

Some guy in "some forum", hah?
I guess attribution and linking to the source (inviting readers to draw their own conclusions) are not very relevant for Aaron. Yes, you can google it, if you really want...

I totally understand that people coming from different places may have very different views on the same subject. I'm not the one to hold it against PUA's for sticking to their canned routines. They were stuck and this new mindset "saved them". They probably hold harder to this new mindset than they did to the old, unproductive beliefs.
And we all have our own blind spots. What hit me on Aaron's review was the negative tone, as if he wanted to be polite and knew there was a lot of good in the book but couldn't really make himself tell his readers why they ought (or not) get the book. Maybe it's just my perception but in light of Matt T's comment above it does make a lot of sense.


Mark, time to reinstate "the definitive post on height, looks and money" sticky?

[crazyhorse]

Alvar Wrote:Some guy in "some forum", hah?
I guess attribution and linking to the source (inviting readers to draw their own conclusions) are not very relevant for Aaron. Yes, you can google it, if you really want...

I totally understand that people coming from different places may have very different views on the same subject. I'm not the one to hold it against PUA's for sticking to their canned routines. They were stuck and this new mindset "saved them". They probably hold harder to this new mindset than they did to the old, unproductive beliefs.
And we all have our own blind spots. What hit me on Aaron's review was the negative tone, as if he wanted to be polite and knew there was a lot of good in the book but couldn't really make himself tell his readers why they ought (or not) get the book. Maybe it's just my perception but in light of Matt T's comment above it does make a lot of sense.

Mark, time to reinstate "the definitive post on height, looks and money" sticky?

Seems I'm not the only one left with that perception. He completely neglected the 3 fundamentals, which until today are still my "rule of thumb", so to speak.

On the other hand he's saying exactly what Mark is saying, in a nutshell "focus on other things that make you stand out". See the example with the 5f5 bodybilder. It's also true that wome generally prefer a guy to be taller or roughly the same height.

I think it's just his way of communicating that is very negative.

I highly advice you to read his reddit Q&A, cause in there he comes across as a totally different person.

[Brian]

If Aaron sleazy actually have more value than telling people to hit the gym, i would've sign up on his forum instead of being here. The fact of the matter is, he's a one trick pony. There isnt much advices he can offer.

[Matt II]

Brian Wrote:If Aaron sleazy actually have more value than telling people to hit the gym, i would've sign up on his forum instead of being here. The fact of the matter is, he's a one trick pony. There isnt much advices he can offer.

He does give advice in his book "Minimal Game". Quite similiar to what 60 Years of Challenge says. Get sexual fast, it is a numbers game to a certain extent, dress well and look you´re best to maximize "good" responses from the ladies. Solid fundamentals no one can really argue with IMO and probably the 80% of assests that give you the 20% of success.