“Check, Please” – A Story of Perspective

At 8:12PM, a woman at Table 5, tall, slim, brown hair, ground zero, center-stage, stands and shrieks incomprehensible yet vulgar syllables at the man across from her. The restaurant pauses to watch. The woman launches the contents of her half-full wine glass at the man. The gentleman flinches his eyes shut and the Clos Pepe Pinot Noir 2005 splatters across his face, his tie, his collar and dinner jacket, spattering the table and floor behind him.
Under her chandelier spotlight, the woman sweeps herself up and out of the room in a huff of anger, exit stage-left, tears imminent, purse swinging, hand up to hail a cab before she’s even out the door.
The room holds its place for a moment: silent and waiting, watching, and then like a record slowly resuming speed, it revs back up to its natural rhythms and clanks and heart murmurs.
At Table 7, Lynn Marshall watched the woman and her drama with extra interest. Lynn felt disgusted. Proud, independent, assertive, an activist bettering humanity, Lynn saw herself as all of these things. Lynn wouldn’t throw wine at a man; she’d throw the bottle. Her self-assurance in that moment would appear to others as strength and others as arrogance.
Lynn had thought about these things before. What Lynn didn’t think about in that moment were the neighborhood boys who threw rocks at her as a child, or the cousin who was raped but had been too afraid to report it to the police, or the way mom and dad always seemed to have time for everything except her or each other.
She also didn’t think of stellar grades in her Women’s Studies courses in college, or the way her activism brought out her independence and identity for the first time in her life; how her feminist professors gave her strong role models to look up to and something to believe in, something to care about, a worthy cause that she knows could make a difference in the world.
She didn’t think of the rape statistics or the theories on gender socialization or the patriarchy or the objectification of beauty or her apparent inability to feel much intimacy in her relationships anymore, man or woman. Instead, all she thought was, “Well, yet another asshole is in our midst,” and said as much to her friend across the table. The statement spoke all of these things so she didn’t have to.
At Table 11, the woman’s yelp almost made John Woodwin drop his neatly pasta’d fork onto his lap. John’s reaction to this unexpected jolt was the same reaction he had to most stressful events in his life: indignation.
When the woman threw the wine, John didn’t think of the wife who had divorced him for a guy who made half as much money. He didn’t think about the high school girlfriend who left him in an eerily similar fashion either, without calling him or even notifying him directly. Even if he wanted to, he wouldn’t have been able to think about the way he poured himself into his work — code, systems, logic — because it was the only thing in his life he felt he could control and predict.
He didn’t think of the way his mother babied him and over-protected him, gave him everything yet smothered him, reinforcing for him again and again that isolation and loneliness are best found in the arms of a woman. That love is equal to a lack of independence.
His eyes did the thinking for him, as did the tingly sensation in his pants as he watched her ass bob up and down through her strong, angry gait out the door. “Women are so irrational. Entitled bitch, she probably deserved whatever happened to her.”
Marge and Bob Roland, an elderly couple, sat at Table 3. When the woman screamed, Marge’s body swiveled the full 180 degrees in her chair, like a cat caught off guard. Marge was attracted to drama of any sort these days. And she knew this. She also knew that little ever seemed to happen in her life anymore. What she didn’t know is what happened in the restaurant that night. “Ohhhhh my, what happened?” she said in an exaggerated tone.
To her it didn’t matter whose fault it was. It just mattered that there was a fault at all. These rare moments gave her a fleeting nostalgia for the passions of her past. It stoked a dark, unseen place inside Marge, a place that silently envied the woman in the black dress and her tears, a place that took a certain amount of excitement in viewing another in pain.
“I wonder what happened.” she said again as she turned back to Bob. Bob never even looked up at the commotion. Instead he kept shoveling risotto into his mouth. Marge would ask again, and then again, and then again, at least three more times before the night was over. “My goodness, what happened?” It was like the chorus to a song Bob had been listening to for 56 years; he could predict every rhythm and every note as it came. He had fallen in love with that song and been sickened by that song a hundreds times and a hundred times again. He had listened to it for so long that he had forgotten what it was like to not listen to it.
“Eat your food Margey” he said after the third chorus.
At Table 16, Charles Taylor, alone at a corner table, overweight, messy and bearded, looked up from his book — a recent translation of an old Chekhov favorite — to watch the commotion unfold. “For Christ’s sake lady, that’s a good wine you’re throwing out,” he thought, and then returned to his book.
The Maître D’ observed the events from the front of the restaurant. When the woman stood up and began walking toward him, his emotions swelled and his chest tightened. As she walked past, as if in slow motion, he could detect the bounce of every curl in her hair, the sway of each hip, the crest of every tear about to erupt and flood her carefully designed face.
His heart sped up. He himself began to find himself upset. In his mind, he was upset for the woman, that she was so hurt. But he was also upset about being ignored, the years and years of being ignored and passed over. The sacrifice. The nights laying in bed fantasizing, romanticizing about moments like this, moments where he could save her, be needed by her, where her head would fall on his shoulder and he’d tell her everything will all right and it would be true.
He was upset that the wine wasn’t thrown on him instead.
He moved. He followed her outside. As he ran after her, every dream and desire to fix her, to be the one to rescue her, to earn her love in a single dramatic moment, to finally earn what he’d spent his whole life believing he deserved, came to the tip of his tongue. And was then swallowed. “I can call you a taxi if you would like,” he said lamely. The tears told him “No,” and he lingered, ignored and forgotten. As always, ignored.
Inside, the waiter rushed to the man’s side to clean up the mess. While he wiped the wine off the man’s suit and tie the waiter bristled with a faint excitement. It buzzed and vibrated through his skin. Love, drama, anger. These moments were when he felt most alive.
In the waiter’s family, resentment and blame were how loved ones communicated; wine thrown on someone was called Tuesday. He saw a certain romance in the pain on the man’s face as he cleaned off his collar.
This, to him, was what love felt like. It was the same hint of romance he felt the time his boyfriend hit him out of anger. He felt it beneath the pain and the sadness and the unbearable disappointment of the man he had chosen to be with, but it was there. Barely. He felt it when he came out to his father and was disowned on the spot. The role of the martyr. The undeserved punishment, taken and carried for the sake of someone else. Thankless.
While being wiped clean, the man himself stared blankly ahead at the space which she had previously inhabited. Her space. It was hers, and now another space is hers and then another will be hers again. He could almost see the air rushing to fill the vacuum she left behind. The physics of it were just so perplexing. He stared on and on, into the space. She would never inhabit the exact same space again. None of us do.
Finally, after the wine was cleaned and the vacuum filled and the murmurs resumed, he calmly looked up at the waiter.
“Check, please.”



very good writing
Damn right!
I enjoyed the idea that each observer assigned meaning to a single event acccording to their own perceptual maps – it’s a powerful way of reminding us that we (too) have biases. If you’re open to sugestions, include one person who is aware of his / her biases and sees clearly. Also, I would enjoy reading a short post that provided that backstory to the main couple.
Mark, this is exactly correct. To me, this is your best article yet.
Mark, great article / story on how we all perceive things from a different view point. Everyone in the room saw the exact same event occur, however due to their upbringings, experiences, and attitude they all perceived the situation differently.
It would be great if you could tie this story into how this relates to some of your readers. For example, I’m sure a lot of your readers, myself included a lot of the times, are insecure about their current situation. They might live at home, might hate their job, or is in a relationship that is unhealthy for them. Teaching us to view these situations from a different light is a fantastic lesson that I have learned and has helped me get through some tough times until I was able to change. If you live at home, so what? You have a roof over your head, parents that feed you, and one day you will move out on you own when you have the money. You hate you job, who cares? You are learning some great skills, building your resume, and you have the option to go change it if you want!
Just tweaking your perception a bit on how to view these situations is an important development I think we could all learn from.
@jasonsmi Said everything in such a perfect manner. Ditto and kudos dude
@DulceDeLauryn Thanks
Ipanema Boardwalk esque. http://postmasculine.com/the-ipanema-boardwalk
@ZacChamp I loved Ipanema Boardwalk at the time, but this one is on a different level IMO.
When the man came home, he saw her suitcase waiting by the door on the stairs. Her scarf was on top of the mailbox, and he could sense her perfumed figure was only metres away. She came outside as he entered the hall. ”I’m packed,” she declared wistfully, her hair glowing under the moonlight. “I guess it’s what you wanted after all this. I’m sorry..” she said, her voice trailing away. ”I really didn’t want to know,” he replied, “but sometimes words and stories come to you when you don’t want to read anything.”
When the man came home, he saw her suitcase waiting by the door on the stairs. Her scarf was on top of the mailbox, and he could sense her perfumed figure was only metres away.
She came outside as he entered the hall.
“I’m packed,” she declared wistfully, her hair glowing under the moonlight. “I guess it’s what you wanted after all this. I’m sorry..” she said, her voice trailing away.
“I really didn’t want to know,” he replied, “but sometimes words and stories come to you when you don’t want to read anything.”
dude, write a fiction book. this is magical and i know you could make these kinds of posts into something so much more powerful if you SHOWED the development of the character traits instead of having to TELL them in such a small space. that deep understanding of the root causes of emotions really lends itself to some incredible stuff.
@ZachObront I’ve attempted some short fiction in private before. It’s so much harder than non-fiction. Maybe one day.
I have nothing to add except adulation.
awesome. so true.
a principle i experienced while hiking the inca trail.
i was envious of the couples that hiked it together. the friends that were there together. while realizing that other would be envious of my freedom and courage to hike this adventure solo.
it’s all the way you look at it.
Have you ever heard the writing tip that says you should almost always delete the first sentence (or paragraph) of your writing? That rule definitely applies to this piece.

Disclaimer: I intend this to be a critique of your writing, not of you as a person.
Go to the top and read this article again, but this time skip the first sentence. Notice how much better it is. The first sentence or paragraph is almost always filled with unnecessary exposition, unnecessary details, and unnecessary “poetic” flourishes.
Let’s take a closer look:
“On a hazy, cold evening in an expensive Italian restaurant somewhere in an anonymous city, between flickering glows of table candles and lulls of violins and cork pops, the patrons gently murmur and giggle to the rhythms of the imperceptible sway of chandeliers above.”
So, what does this sentence accomplish? Why is it here? To give us information? To set the scene? To set the tone?
Is any of this information actually necessary, or can the readers infer most of it from your next sentence?
>> “Hazy, cold evening”
Who cares about the weather if the story takes place inside a restaurant?
>> “an expensive Italian restaurant”
We can infer that it’s a restaurant from several of the details in the following sentences, like when you say “at Table 5″ or “the restaurant pauses to watch.” Actually, “we’re in a restaurant” is probably the one piece of information that’s valuable in this sentence.
>> “somewhere in an anonymous city”
That’s exactly where we would think this story took place if you did not include the description “somewhere in an anonymous city.”
It’s anonymous when you don’t tell us the exact city we’re in. You don’t need to say “anonymous city,” you just don’t say the name of the city.
>> “between flickering glows of table candles and lulls of violins and cork pops”
This is nonsense on multiple levels.
When you say “between” you imply that these two things have a similar nature — that they might be two points in space or time — and that your patrons are in the middle of them. But here you’re mixing sights and sounds. How can you be between a sight and a sound?
Maybe a word like “amid” would make more sense then “between”.
And what are “lulls of violins and cork pops”? A lull is “a temporary interval of quiet or lack of activity.” So a lull in violins and cork pops is the moment when you cannot hear those sounds. So “between lulls” is the moment where you can hear the sounds. Is that what you intended? Or were you trying to say during a lull in sound, i.e. a quiet moment?
Continuing on:
>> “the patrons gently murmur and giggle to the rhythms of the imperceptible sway of chandeliers above.”
Murmuring and giggling to the rhythm of a chandelier’s sway? … Really? WTF does that mean?
If the sway is imperceptible, how is that creating a rhythm at all? So it’s barely moving? So no rhythm then?
And why would anyone murmur and giggle to the rhythm of a swaying object? Are they hypnotized? If their sounds matched the rhythm of a sound in the room, like the music of a live band — ok, I’d buy that. But convesation matching the rhythm of the ceiling lights? Uh… nope.
Besides, the noise of conversation in a restaurant is famously chaotic and void of rhythm, because it’s dozens of people talking with no regard to the conversations around them. It’s like a band where each musician is playing their own tune and ignoring what the others are playing.
—
Your first sentence is your most important sentence. That’s where you’ll win or lose most of your readers.
Most readers will not analyze your first sentence like I did, but if it is not understandable and engaging it will have an effect on them. Confusing, annoying and incomprehensible descriptions accumulate until the reader gets tired of having to work out what your really trying to say.
My main intention here is not to show you that your sentence is shitty, but to show you *why* your sentence is shitty. And to show you that every writer will end up with a shitty sentence when he does what you were trying to do.
You were trying to set the scene in an eloquent way. You were trying to be a good writer. You were trying to write something that sounds like what good writers would write. You were forcing it, and that’s why it came out shitty.
You wrote nonsense that sounded writerly because you felt you should, or you felt you couldn’t write something plain and simple and amateur-sounding.
—
Let’s say this was a real event that you witnessed, how would you tell this story to a friend?
Imagine the look on his face if you started off by saying that first sentence: “On a hazy, cold evening in an expensive Italian restaurant somewhere in an anonymous city … ”
If he was a good friend, he’d promptly smack you in the face
Do you feel comfortable saying that sentence out loud? Even when no one’s around to hear you? I’d be willing to bet you sound like that when you talk, so why do you want to sound like that when you write?
—
Having said that, I’ve been reading your blog for some time and I will keep reading it.
I tune in for your insight, observations and understanding.
I attribute your success to what you say, not how you say it.
When you’ve got substance, you don’t need style.
@FrankSometimes Thanks for the free lesson (That’s totally genuine). I’ve never taken anything more than a freshman writing class and I’m always trying to get better.
@postmasculine I would not have faulted you for getting defensive, because I’ll admit my critique was probably too harsh, too ranty and definitely too long. But I am glad that you found some value in my comment.
If you found my perspective valuable, check out the guy I learned it from: William Zinsser and his book On Writing Well. Here’s a snippet:
“Clutter is the disease of American writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaningless jargon.
…
Our national tendency is to inflate and thereby sound important.
…
The airline pilot who announces that he is presently anticipating experiencing considerable precipitation wouldn’t think of saying it may rain. The sentence is too simple – there must be something wrong with it.
…
But the secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components. Every word that serves no function, every long word that could be a short word, every adverb that carries the same meaning that’s already in the verb, every passive construction that leaves the reader unsure of who is doing what – these are the thousand and one adulterants that weaken the strength of a sentence. And they usually occur in proportion to education and rank.”
@FrankSometimes @postmasculine Mostly @FrankS, I am a lover of good prose and I have occasionally wanted to post some “helpful advice.” But I never have. I think it is important to reach, and it isn’t always pretty at first. But this guy has built something really cool by being fearless. My experience and observation is that MFA’s are too often too cautious and “correct.” They are afraid to do it wrong.
Your heart is clearly in the right place, so, no complaints. But I hope this joint continues as rough and unpolished, or as smooth and polished, as it’s author lives it at any given moment. That’s why I read it.
Regards
@FrankSometimes @postmasculine Examples are more powerful than critiques. Here’s JD Salinger:
“If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you’ll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my parents were occupied and all before they had me, and all that David Copperfield kind of crap, but I don’t feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth”
And Joseph Conrad:
“He was an inch, perhaps two, under six feet, powerfully built, and he advanced straight at you with a slight stoop of the shoulders, head forward, and a fixed from-under stare which made you think of a charging bull.”
@Nicholas1959 @FrankSometimes @postmasculine I disagree. It was worth getting specific. Great advice and I’d hope to handle myself with similar grace if I was the one getting critiqued. Orwell has a famous and excellent essay that makes the same point as Frank that is really worth reading: https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm
@timfraser123 @FrankSometimes @postmasculine I’ll read it Tim, thanks. And I agree, Mark read it as intended, no ego.
@FrankSometimes Wow, you’re right. Just deleted first paragraph…
@FrankSometimes I first read this and thought you were a bit of an ass but once I separated my reaction to you as a person from what you actually said, I concluded you were right. Most people probably didn’t notice the first sentence and had Mark left it in the piece would’ve been fine. But without it the piece is stronger. There isn’t any extraneous fluff in the way. You’re right and you defend your position well.
Thanks for taking the time to detail *why* it isn’t a good start to the piece.
@tayloramurphy1 I think that “a bit of an ass” is a fair assessment. But I figured if Mark could handle the comments in A Dust Over India, he could probably handle my writing critique.
Elements of Style?
Beautifully written. Why must there be so much pain in this world? The dulled acceptance and resignation that occurs over and over in daily life can be heartbreaking. Your piece reminds me of a short story I read recently “Michael Chabon – Ocean Avenue” Give it a read if you have some time http://archives.newyorker.com/?i=1989-11-06#folio=052
@John247 Without pain there can be no pleasure…
Well done.
After reading this piece, it sums up the whole range of thoughts and opinions associated with male and female interactions. Very well written.