Are You An Emotional Vampire?
Here’s a quick quiz for you to take. Answer the following questions. Be as honest as possible:
- Do you feel that people often don’t (or can’t) understand you or your problems?
- Do you feel that there are many barriers in your life which you have no control over?
- Do you often ask for help from others and/or feel like few people are willing to help you?
- Do you feel like you often don’t receive the attention or appreciation that you deserve?
- Do people often complain that you don’t listen to them, when in fact, you feel like they don’t listen to you?
- Do you feel like most other people have lives that are much easier than yours?
- Do you fight with close friends and loved ones often?
- If so, is it usually their fault?
- Do people suddenly drop contact with you with no explanation and refuse to communicate with you again?
- Do you often feel helpless, like you have little opportunity to improve your life?
If you answered “yes” to more than half of the questions above, then please read this post carefully. It could very well be the first step to turning all of the above problems around. Parts of this article may not be easy to read. But I implore you to keep an open mind and take it seriously.
If you answered “yes” to at least half of the above questions, chances are you are an emotional vampire. Don’t take that the wrong way, it’s not your fault. It just means you’ve been hurt in the past. And as a result, you inadvertently hurt those around you, who in return, push you away and hurt you further. It’s a vicious cycle. But you can’t help it, because you aren’t even aware of it.
By now you may be saying, “Fuck this guy, what does he know? Where’s my back button?” I worked in a field where I coached and helped numerous people like you. Emotional vampires are nothing new to me, and I feel that I’ve gotten good at spotting them. I’ve also gotten entangled with many earlier in my life and have the scars to prove it. So if you are experiencing many of the problems listed above in your life, or are close to someone who is, what’s there to lose in at least hearing me out to the end of the article?
Who Are Emotional Vampires?
Emotional vampires are called emotional vampires because they have a tendency to drain the emotional energy out of everyone they come in contact with. They’re exhausting. They need constant attention. They always have some crisis or major life event. They’re experts at eliciting emotional reactions out of others and then feeding off those emotions, regardless of whether they’re positive emotions or negative emotions.
All emotional vampires suffer from low self-esteem, but not all people with low self-esteem are emotional vampires. Low self esteem comes in a number of flavors and manifests itself differently from person to person and emotional vampires are people with a specific subset of self esteem issues.
Emotional vampires exhibit three specific traits simultaneously: an excessive need for validation/attention from others, the belief that little to nothing that occurs is their fault, and the lack of self-awareness to recognize their self-defeating patterns. People who are familiar with Six Pillars of Self Esteem by Nathaniel Branden will recognize that these are three of the six pillars — or rather, these are a lack of three of the pillars.
This is a dangerous combination for two reasons: 1) these three traits reinforce one another and make each other stronger, and 2) they can often suck in and hurt otherwise good people around them.
And don’t be mistaken, emotional vampires are not all pathetic losers. They can be some of the most charming and successful people you meet. Men, women, beautiful, ugly, rich, poor, they come in many shapes and sizes. But they always create toxic relationships, both as romantic partners and as friends.
1. An Excessive Need for Validation/Attention From Others: Conversations with emotional vampires are invariably dominated by one person: them. It’s all about them, their problems, how so-and-so was such a dick to them, how so-and-so wants to get back at them, how awesome they are, how pathetic they are, how everyone wants to be like them, how everyone hates them, etc. The torrential out-pour of self-centeredness from them is either delusional in how awesome they think they are (“Everyone on my team at work wanted to work with me, but I told my manager that I couldn’t stand to be around Dave,”) or delusional in how pathetic and helpless they are (“Nobody on the choir trip wants to room with me. It’s because they’re all so stuck up and are prettier than I am.”). Often these delusions of grandeur and victimization happen back-to-back within the same conversation. Either way, it only takes an hour of conversation with an emotional vampire before one is inspired to slam their forehead against a hard surface repeatedly. Make the noise stop. Please, make it stop.
Emotional vampires are also apt to make grand public displays in order to garner attention. Again, these can be both self-serving or self-loathing. Think that annoying guy in the office who stands up and makes an inappropriate announcement just to get a few laughs. Or the girl at the party, who, when made fun of, throws a screaming fit and runs out of the room crying. As they say, there’s no such thing as bad publicity. And when you’re as attention-starved as emotional vampires, creating any sort of emotional reaction out of those around you — even if it’s indignation, pity, anger, or hatred — is worth it.
The excessive need for validation and attention is what pushes people away from the emotional vampire in the beginning. The constant need for affirmation drains people’s energy and patience. The emotional ups and downs, the dramatic successes and failures, they’re all tiring and most (self-respecting) people aren’t willing to tolerate it. Therefore, they’ll make a clear move to ignore the emotional vampire after meeting them, thus reaffirming to the vampire that people are mean, that nobody likes them, that they’re a victim and yes… it’s not their fault.
2. The Belief that Their Problems Are Not Their Fault: The excessive needy behavior of emotional vampires elicits negative reactions from others and drives people away from them. But instead of considering that people responded negatively towards them because what they said/did was offensive or self-centered or rude or whiny or obnoxious or upsetting, they prefer to believe that all of those around them are assholes, racists, bigots, stuck up, rude, cold, etc., etc.
This combination of behaviors is insidious. The excessive need for validation leads to anti-social behavior, which leads to negative reactions from others, which leads the emotional vampire to blame others and feel even more victimized, which then leads to an even deeper need for validation, and then even more anti-social behavior, and so on…
The ability of an emotional vampire to rationalize his or her anti-social behavior can be mesmerizing. It goes way beyond simply projecting negative qualities onto others (i.e., “my boss fired me because he’s a dick,” and not “my boss fired me because I walk around calling people dicks behind their backs,”). No, the rationalizations can go far deeper than that. I know. I was a dating coach for many years and witnessed it first hand. All girls in clubs are stuck up sluts. All southern white women are racist. Women are only interested in looks and there’s nothing you can do about it. Women are only attracted to men with money. Women are too stupid to see how cool I am. All the while, it was obvious to me and anybody else, that these women were rejecting these men because their attitudes sucked and they were self-centered, not because of the other reasons.
There is only one type of person who will let themselves get close to an emotional vampire: other low self esteem individuals. They are either are too dysfunctional themselves to notice negative effect the vampire’s behavior has on them, or they are emotional vampires themselves who crave the endless drama, attention and victimization. Once again, we see that in emotional relationships like attracts like, and the old adage is true: that if everyone you date is crazy, then it probably means you’re crazy.
3. Lack of Self-Awareness: One would think that an emotional vampire would eventually begin to detect the pattern in which they live — certain behaviors lead to certain reactions from others, these reactions are not pleasant so perhaps we should re-examine our behaviors and beliefs, that the only constant in all of your relationships is yourself, and if all of your relationships suck or are fucking up, then maybe you should start with the one thing they all have in common.
This would seem obvious, but it rarely occurs to the emotional vampire. They are not capable of being honest with themselves and accepting responsibility for their lives. Psychologically, they NEED a scapegoat — whether it’s blaming their appearance, the racism towards others, an office conspiracy against them, how mom and dad never treat them right, or an endless array of other self-defeating beliefs. They’ve always been so focused externally that they never developed an ability to sit down and analyze their own thoughts and emotions and question their utility. Emotional vampires often hate to be alone. They also tend to cause conflict if there isn’t any already. The reason is that they need to distract themselves from, well… themselves. This lack of awareness keeps their blame game going. The blame game keeps the search for validation and attention going. And the search for external validation and attention keeps the lack of self-awareness going. One big shit spiral.
How to Break Out of the Pattern
“A loving person lives in a loving world, a hostile person lives in a hostile world. Everyone you meet is your mirror.”
- Ken Keyes, Jr.
So if you’re still reading this and thinking, “Oh crap, this is so me, I’m such a dick…” Relax. You’re not a dick. You didn’t know any better. And you can change things. Starting now.
Step 1: Begin paying attention to what you have control over rather than what you don’t have control over. You can’t control whether your boss is a dick or not, or whether the girls in clubs are stuck up or whatever, or whether your co-workers don’t have the same interests as you. Therefore it doesn’t matter and you should immediately stop worrying about it and blaming it for your problems. Ask yourself: what CAN you control? You can control your conduct at work. So start there. You can control your productivity. You can control how well you dress when you go out. You can control how nervous you are when meeting a new woman. You can control how many women you approach while you’re out. Start there. And if you fail because of something or someone else, ignore it. It’s not important. Focus on what you control.
Step 2: Practice gratitude and appreciation for what you DO have. Chances are, no matter how bad things are for you, they could easily be a lot worse. You could be disfigured, homeless, not have parents, have no education, etc. Make a point each morning when you wake up to look in the mirror and say one thing you’re thankful for, and feel it. Don’t just say it, actually feel the gratitude as you say it. “I am ridiculously grateful for my great education, it gives me a lot of opportunities that most people don’t have.” There. That wasn’t so hard. Make sure it’s something different each day.
Step 3: Show appreciation for others. Start practicing random acts of kindness for your friends, family and those around you. I know you’re cringing right now. But you get what you give, and that external validation you’ve craved so much for your entire life will only come to you when you start giving validation to others, and doing it randomly.
Try this as an experiment. Each day for a week, challenge yourself to do one of the following: give someone a compliment, thank someone close to you, or give someone a gift.
Simple examples:
“Hey Gina, your dress looks really nice today.”
“Mom, I know we haven’t always gotten along, but I want to thank you for everything you’ve done for me.”
“Hey Steve, they had a special in the cafeteria, so I bought you lunch.”
I know this feels all mushy and stuff, but try it. And don’t expect anything in return. This is the most important part. Don’t turn around three days later and say, “Steve, you fuckface, you never bought me anything! Oh God, everyone hates me!”
No… don’t do that. You may want to. But control yourself. Please control yourself.
The three steps dismantle the feedback loop of the emotional vampire. Focusing only on things you can control forces you to begin taking responsibility for what happens to you. Practicing gratitude forces you to step out of your victim mentality of blaming others and seeking more validation. Showing appreciation invites genuine validation from others rather than superficial attention.
And of course, consciously practicing these three things forces you to become more aware of your own actions and emotions. This will create a new, more positive, feedback loop.
Now, I imagine that a few of you reached this point in the article and are thinking, “Man, some people are just so clueless. Great article. But my problems are real. I actually do have a problem that I have no control over. He just doesn’t get it. Just like nobody else gets it. Oh well…”
If you found yourself saying that at any point during this article, I’ve got some bad news. You’re one of them. And you may want to scroll back up to the top and start all over again.

Get your dating life handled. Become an attractive man once and for all, without faking it or pretending to be someone you’re not.
Models: Attract Women Through Honesty has been referred to as the best book in the field by many, and has received five-star reviews from all over the world.




[...] http://postmasculine.com/are-you-an-emotional-vampire [...]
Mark,
Awesome article as usual. Really think this is what a lot of people out there need to hear. *going straight to be facebook-link this
pardon the grammar: *facebook-linking this
I threw this on Facebook too. I thought this was so applicable to so many people I know, even myself included. Great article. It’s almost hard to come up with things to say about this. Just damn.
Yeah, every now and then a big psychology article draws a deafening silence… it’s OK. I take it that people are just digesting…
Like always, great article. A lot of times, I feel like I am an emotional vampire as well. Except I actually have real problems. Haha. I kid.
Mark, you mentioned that you see a lot of emotional vampires when you coached. I was wondering if you saw a lot of codependents as well (ex: nice guys who want to help out girls with their problems)? The reason I ask is I used to be a codependent and finding out how I was raised (and thus find out deep rooted issues in my upbringing) helped me to become more confident. I feel that maybe focusing on this parent-child dynamic can help others who are bad with women to find out where they went wrong.
For example, the Rawness goes into how nice guys are raised by Narcisisstic parents and thus turned a normal human being into a nice guy by ignoring his needs as a child:
http://therawness.com/reader-letters-1-part-4/
When I read it on the rawness, I felt like a lot of people in PUA community and maybe even some readers of this site were actually codependents and that writing about botched parenting can help others see where they went wrong. Maybe you could make a post like: The 5 types of bad parenting styles: narcissist, waif mother, covert narcissist father, etc. Just a thought, if ur looking for something to write in a future post.
How our parents create our emotional problems is an article I plan on writing at one point.
To answer your question, yes. Lots of codependents, lots of people with narcissistic tendencies (emotional vampires being a segment of them). A lot of guys who I think are probably undiagnosed (mild) asberger’s as well.
That Rawness article indirectly inspired this one. T writes about emotional vampires quite a bit. I recently had an encounter with one, so I decided to take the ball and run with it.
I am looking forward to that future post on parenting.
Yeah, the community really seems to have a lot of Asberger’s people too. Sometimes I feel that way. I think one of theRawness’s links was for a therapist, who said something that really sums up the phenomenon. She says that kids of narcissists become “These folks accustomed to thinking their way through life, as opposed to feeling their way along.”
That sounds like Asberger’s to me. I haven’t done any research on Asberger’s, but I think this may help a lot of ppl too (myself included). There needs to be a blog dedicated to the unwritten social rules in America, because not everyone can feel their way through situations, especially those with messed up parents. And then, it’s all negative feedback loop, bad parenting leads to bad social interactions, leads to 40 year old virgins.
There’s a biological/genetic aspect to some of this as well.
One reason I’m excited about the guys I hired is that it’s going to give me a lot more time to read/write about deeper psychological stuff like this. Right now, I haven’t read up enough on it to know exactly.
Re: Aspergers and such. I recommend The Essential Difference by Simon Baron-Cohen (yeah, Borat’s cousin) who works as a research psychologist. He studies Aspergers/autism and concludes that on average (NOT ALL) females are stronger empathizers and that on average (NOT ALL) males are stronger systemizers, meaning that they are motivated to create and understand systems…meaning things with input/operation/output and cause and effect relationships (guns, political systems, videogames…and PUA for that matter. HE doesnt mention PUA, but it is one such system). And we know how women feel about systems without empathy. I’d love to hear your take on that.
Thanks for the recommendation. Will check it out.
To give this more of a headstart I got a few questions I discussed with a friend recently regarding responsibility, freedom, determinism and freewill.
I subscribe completely to your philosophy of taking complete responsibility for one’s life but my friend argues that everything happening in this life is determined by prior events and that therefore free will (which is required for taking responsibity) is just an illusion as it’s just a result of chemical processes in the brain.
How should one argue against this? We already got through regress ad infinitum, quantum physics, the contradictions of this kind of nihilism but we still didn’t come to an agreement.
I got this point as well, assuming that there’s a bigger than zero chance that real freedom exists:
If everything is deterministic and I believe in freedom then I never got a real choice in the first place and my “mistake” doesn’t matter.
If freewill exists and I believe everything to be deterministic, I have thrown my responsibilty out of the window for no reason.
Is it therefore right to believe in freedom regardless of the state of the universe?
It can’t be that easy, right? I cannot think of a counterargument for this one.
I know this is more of a philosophical theme rather than a psychological one but I would be interested in your take on this.
To contribute at least a bit to the psychological part:
I answered no to all ten questions but I know some people behaving like this and can absolutely confirm your points. Is it normal for teenagers (16-18) to express this kind of behaviour at times?
Wow… awesome comment.
What you and your friend are referring to is the classic “Mind-Body Problem” in philosophy. I think it’s a false duality and people (like your friend) who buy into scientific determinism are copping out. Here’s why:
1) You can talk about neuro-science all you want, but at the end of the day, we experience reality through consciousness. If your girlfriend dies in a car accident, you don’t sit around dwelling on your serotonin levels… you ask yourself, “How do I move on from this?” Neurochemistry is a reflection of consciousness and consciousness is the reflection of neurochemistry. They’re on in the same thing… one is merely experienced internally, the other is experienced externally. So for someone to say, “I have no control over my actions, my brain chemistry does,” it makes no sense… he IS his brain chemistry.
2) Neuroplasticity. Look it up. Your conscious thoughts can physically rewire your brain. Neurochemistry doesn’t just affect consciousness, consciousness affects neurochemistry.
3) Even if you accept ipso facto that all of our behaviors are determined by external factors, this is not very useful to us, because there are an infinite number of external factors. If you go back far enough on the chain of causation, like you said, it goes back infinitely and everything is indirectly causing everything. I see in no way how this should influence one’s decision making. Whether my choices are of free will, or if they’re caused by an infinite number of circumstantial occurrences going back forever, I don’t really give a shit, I’m going to do what I want as I experience in my consciousness, and for anybody to not do that, they’re making excuses. In this case, extremely intelligent and philosophical excuses, but excuses nonetheless.
Check out this interview with Ken Wilber. He’s made a career of dismantling scientific deterministic views like your friend’s. He does a much better job than I:
http://www.salon.com/2008/04/28/ken_wilber/
You’re right that you and your friend won’t be able to come to an agreement, because there’s no way to prove things either way. I look at this from a very practical aspect though. There have been studies that show that people who believe in free will are more likely to be happier, to feel like the world is a fairer place, and to achieve better in tests. You can read about some of them here: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/science/22tier.html?pagewanted=all
And there appears to be causation, not just correlation.
So from a practical perspective, there are four options.
1. Do not believe in free will, free will does not exist. In this case your fate was determined either way, your belief is irrelevant. Neutral.
2. Believe in free will, free will does not exist. Again, your fate was determined either way. Whether you believe in it or not is irrelevant. Neutral.’
3. Do not believe in free will, free will exists. In this case you are handicapping yourself by not believing in it. Negative for you.
4. Believe in free will, free will exists. In this case you are advantaged by believing in it. Positive from you.
From this we can see that there is literally no gain in not believing in free will. If it doesn’t exist, we have no control over our beliefs and they are irrelevant. If we do have control, we are disadvantaging ourselves by not believing in it. There is literally no way to lose from believing in it on the other hand.
Of course you can’t (truly) choose to believe something just because it would suit you, but if you’re looking at it from a cost/benefit perspective, which it sounds like your friend is to some extent, then you can justify it that way.
I would go even a step further and say that whether or not free will exists, we all experience it as free will, so it’s kind of pointless to talk about in the context of your decision-making.
Yes. Some people conclude: “Well, if free will does not exist, then I am not responsible for my actions, and therefore I can decide to do anything I wish, because it is not me that decides it.” There is a freaking huge contradiction in there.
I bet people much smarter than I have explained this contradiction. But imagine I am sitting across from you and we both believe that free will does not exist. Now I say that since free will does not exist, I can slap you in the face repeatedly, and there’s nothing either of us can do about it, because there is no free will. Would you agree and just take it?
I feel this is related to the idea that, regardless how reality works, things are the way they are. Experience is what it is.
I am aware of a self that can think conscious thoughts and make decisions based on those thoughts.
If free will exists, I am aware of a self that can think conscious thoughts and make decisions based on those thoughts.
If free will does not exist, I am aware of a self that can think conscious thoughts and make decisions based on those thoughts.
Regardless of whether free will exists, it has been that way forever. If it doesn’t exist, it never existed in the first place. If it does exist, it has always existed.
If you learn something new that contradicts what you believed before, you cannot go around stating that the way you experience reality is not the way you experience reality even though it is. (note to self: do not become writer of philosophy, lol)
Bizarrely saw this on my FB news feed and started watching. Seems like he has a pretty deep understanding of the concept. Doing some research now, it seems like there are a few aspects to free will; it’s not just determinism vs free will:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCofmZlC72g&feature=relmfu
The discussion between you and your friend seems to have fallen victim to a problem many of these discussions face: that “free will” is not a well-defined term, and we tend to have some conflicting asumptions about it.
An assumption you have seems to be “Indeterminism is necessary for Free Will”. The problem with that is: let’s assume, there is something like indeterminism, and your will works like that. It is not influenced by the rest of the world: it doesn’t know of it, that would be a kind of influence. So it would be a mindless die. While i don’t know your definition of “free will”, i bet, to be “slave to a die” doesn’t match it.
Your friend seems to have the assumption, if there is some determinism involved, cognition is somehow not “real” anymore, just an illusion caused by chemistry. But: take a hypothetical Person who always finds the truth. You tell him something, and he can decide if it matches the facts or not.
If he is always right, he must be 100% deterministic regarding the presented facts: if the facts do not determine the outcome of his thoughts, they would be not factbased, and therefore only sometimes correct by chance, and just wrong in the other cases.
Mmmmmm. I must be honest and admit I have been guilty of of a lot of the problems stated in this article. I also recognise that a few of the people I coached are emotional vampires (Im coaching one right now). I am in fact tired of his constant dramas and need for attention.
I was a bit dissapointed by the tone of some of the article.
“Think that annoying guy in the office who stands up and makes an inappropriate announcement just to get a few laughs.”
Firstly, this is so subjective its not even funny. Annoying is a point of few, as is inappropriate, and whats wrong with making a comment to get a few laughs?
You could easily argue hes doing your workplace a favour by entertaining your co-workers. Dont get me wrong, theres a guy at my work and I find him annoying. But to my mind my annoyance is a) a projection or b) simply jealousy at how much attention he successfully attracts (whether that makes him an emotional vampire is another matter).
The implication is that everyone finds it annoying and inappropriate, not just you. You get the idea.
But they don’t!!!
Then um… maybe that guy is you.
Mark likes this comment.
You know. I’ve been contemplating this article (and this discussion) and what it means to me and what it says about me:
I get that I can totally be an emotional vampire, and I chose to cut down on this immature behaviour and stop annoying others.
I recognise that the guy I’m working with isn’t a bad guy, I’m just projecting my own repressed anger and shame at my perceived weakness of being a loudmouth. I actually listen to this guy now and you know what? Hes a great guy.
Furthermore I take responsibility for my comments regarding this article and will ensure that any feedback be diplomatic and helpful in future. All the best.
C
Jack, that’s awesome.
This is awesome Jack. Thanks for the honesty and consideration. I hope things go well for you.
It’s a great topic to bring up and extend discussion on, though it’s also not a black and white issue. Each relationship is different and maybe someone’s vampire could be someone else’s good friend.
For instance, some of the sentences up top are something that makes us human. eg Do you feel that people often don’t (or can’t) understand you or your problems? – I think a lot of people would say ‘yes’ to this one.
So I think you could include more ‘test questions’ to make it all clearer, though this I guess is not always possible in a blogzine.
For me, the most important thing is how you feel when you’re with someone, and how you feel after.
Simply, does this person drain you? And as a result do your instincts tell you to be in contact less?
This may not fit in perfectly with the definition of the emotional vampire but for me this is key. Do they lift you up or make you feel put down?
I also think that in many cases because they lack empathy for others, they may completely bypass what you’re saying.
Again, really great topic and I think the ideas here would be really useful for my own students (ie how to deal with difficult people in English).
Honestly, I don’t think vampires are capable of being ANYONE’S good friend. If they are sincere good friends to someone, then they aren’t vampires.
Yeah. Vampire lack empathy because of their self hatred, which is probably from not being unconditionally loved as a child.
Ricky Raw, since I saw your comment, I thought for sure Reading Letter Part 5 would be up. How much longer do I wait? The suspense is killin me.
I hear what you’re saying, but note Mark never said that only answering one or even two of the questions qualified one as a vampire. He said saying yes to more than half of the questions makes one a vampire. That means six yeses. Yes these are all feelings all of us may feel at one time or other but if six or more apply to you at once, that’s a whole different level.
Thanks for the thoughtful responses, I appreciate it. Interestingly, my friend doesn’t deny his responsibility and cousciousness, he’s just stating that it’s a giant illusion (kind of like in the matrix). I just find that point of view to be contradictory and also a bit schizophrenic:
The same neuroscience that’s telling me that we are fundamentally unfree is also reporting that people believing in free-will have better lifes? Yeah, right.
Looking forward to those links.
The problem with psychological pathologies is that there’s no clear-cut definition of what’s supposed to be mentally ill. What I’m personally looking for is a lack of empathy and concern for others, extreme behaviours seeking attention and a long-term tendency of intime relationships (friends, family, sexual) blowing up in their face.
Personally, I’ve chosen to minimize contact with these people but I have to acknowledge that lack of concern and attention-seeking behaviour hinge on my personal judgement which is subjective. Interestingly, I have slight narcisstic tendencies myself, just not to the extent described in the article, eg my relationships remain pretty stable, I assume responsibility for my shortcomings, etc.
It could be that there are not that many vampires on this very site as the content forces one to face inner turmoils, something these people instinctively avoid. In my experience a vampire reverting from his old ways is rare past a certain age as the symptoms tend to prevent positive changes (as it’s not their fault, ever).
The DSV-IV is pretty clear cut on its definition of mental illness and pathologies. What makes psychology different than say, medicine, is that pathologies and mental illnesses exist on a spectrum. So you could be mildly narcissistic or full-on narcissistic.
Does not wanting to post this on Facebook, despite loving the article, make me cool or a pussy?
Decided. A pussy.
If you want to post it, post it. If you don’t don’t. Don’t put yourself down though.
Dooooooo iiiitttt!
What are you afraid of?
Of not fitting in, duh. No worries, it’s up.
A great exercise for increasing gratitude is the ‘What Went Well?’ exercise. It’s from the Positive Psychology field, and has been shown in empirical studies to reduce feelings of depression. It really simple too:
Every night before you go to bed take a few minutes to write down three things that went well for you that day. You also have to write down the reasons related to your own actions for why you think these things happened. The things that went well don’t have to be anything huge. Some examples:
* Had a nice time catching up with my friend Amanda over coffee – I made an effort to get together with her, and didn’t take the fact that she’s been busy these days personally.
* Increased my shoulder press weight, after being stuck for a few months – Had the self-discipline to stick it out and keep going, care about my health and fitness.
* Had a fun evening watching episodes of Community – Took time for myself to relax. Made an effort to discover new shows to watch.
*Approached three girls on campus today – Had the self-discipline to go do it and work on my shyness.
I’ve been doing the exercise for a month or so and can totally vouch for it. It does seem to change what you focus on. Even if you’ve had a couple bad things happen to you that day, at the end of the night you’re still consistently making a list of the things that went well for you.
If you want to read more about Positive Psychology, Martin Seligman is the main guy behind it, and he’s written a few books on the topic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKcyYeZqlh4
Hey mark,
I love your page your textes and your attitude. For me its the only real advice.
In this text i somehow miss the fact that validation from others is not a necessity at all. From no one. Though i know it, its very difficult to be aware of it all the time. I used to seek validation from others a lot.
Peace out
Germany
Hey dima,
It is not true that you don’t need validation from anyone. We all want validation. That is called being human. The question is how you get your validation. Are you constantly being needy and seeking validation from everybody? That’s not good. You can, however, be yourself and do what you want and have people in your life who like you for who you are. That way you also get validation, but you get it for being you.
It feels fantastic to have great people in your life who know you very well and who love you for who you are, because that is extremely validating! But the only way to get that is to show people who you really are, and that requires courage. If you always try to be the person that you think other people want to see, then you can’t have your real self validated and you will always be yearning for more validation.
We discuss this a little bit in the forum as well, here: http://postmasculine.com/forum/Thread-When-I-care-too-much-when-I-m-needy
I find this article applicable to a lot of my female friends although a lot of men have these issues too. Great article mark.
[...] doesn’t mean you have to fix it. If someone has an overly-negative attitude and thinks the world is against them, then telling them they have a negative attitude is not likely to help them. They’re going to [...]
[...] doing. They will talk of why things can’t be done instead of why they can. They will often be emotional vampires looking for every way possible to make themselves out to be a [...]
I am married to a vampire and am exhausted my commitment makes this a difficult situation though.
[...] a constant stream of sympathy and support from everyone around you? When you choose to become an emotional vampire this allows you to complain about the never-ending stream of personal injustices that is now known [...]
Good article, Mark…but may I please test your propositions a little?
I’m the Victim type of EV, constantly in need of more and more interaction that gives less and less to me or the other person. One trait of the Victim is that no one else quite understands. They don’t know our pain, so they can’t possibly care enough not to get it wrong or blow it off. Advice becomes hard to trust, and harder to heed.
Let me give my reactions to some of your observations…
“Step 1: Begin paying attention to what you have control over rather than what you don’t have control over.
…If you fail because of something or someone else, ignore it. It’s not important.”
Those of us of low self-worth tend to make failure our fault even if it isn’t our fault. I can know it isn’t my fault, but don’t always believe it. And by the way,
“failure” can be as simple as feelings of dread or hopelessness during an achievement that might, in itself, be a success.
Short version: The victim has a 3-part strategy for always failing:
1. There is always a failure.
2. It is always your fault.
3. And it always counts.
Point two, of course, plays directly into your “2. The Belief that Their Problems Are Not Their Fault.” I don’t have much to say here, except that I don’t believe all of my problems are my fault. I do have moderately severe depression and nonverbal LD. However, taking it a step further – if I do believe my failures (as stated above) are my fault, how is that healthy even if it creates deeper despair?
I’ve long suspected that the only hope for the Victim is to kill him like a vampire: to drive a stake through his heart. The analogy, I suppose, would be that the Victim’s personality needs to be completely broken, by trauma leading to emotional collapse. We are powerful users of logic games, and I suspect we may need to lose what little grip we have on reality and come to a place where nothing has any meaning if we’re ever to break the habit.
“Step 2: Practice gratitude and appreciation for what you DO have.”
This is tough for someone who was taught very young that my slowness with social cues made me a model ingrate! About the best I do is a kind of forced attitude of gratitude. I know what I should be grateful for, but frankly, I’m too stuck in my own pain to really feel it.
Because you see, for me, what comes with gratitude is guilt. I’m not starving or poor or paralyzed, but I hurt, and I feel guilty that I do. Especially because it causes others pain, and somehow I end up needing to cause them that pain. Not wanting to, but needing to vampire them or go crazy bottling up my hurt.
“Step 3. Show appreciation for others.”
“…And don’t expect anything in return.”
This goes even further than you imagine, Mark. Of course I can’t expect Steve to start buying me drinks every Friday or Gina to hop in the sack with me. But I shouldn’t even expect appreciation back. I shouldn’t even expect to be noticed. I shouldn’t even expect myself to find any meaning in the act.
I could go on. Literally forever. But I won’t.
[...] is the skill of happiness. It’s the cure for an emotional vampire. And it is indeed a skill. It requires practice and effort and habit. But it’s a skill anyone [...]
[...] above, you not only have really shitty boundaries, but you are probably extremely needy and/or an emotional vampire (it’s OK, we still love [...]
People who hate and judge emotional vampires are emotional vampires. People who hate and judge people who hate and judge emotional vampires are emotional vampires…
False.